<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloggers = Journalists (in the eyes of the law)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.web2learning.net/archives/1336/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.web2learning.net/archives/1336</link>
	<description>Web 2.0 and programming tips from a library technology enthusiast, What I Learned Today... covers blogs, rss, wikis and more as they relate to libraries.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.web2learning.net/archives/1336#comment-80936</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web2learning.net/archives/1336#comment-80936</guid>
		<description>The interesting thing about that case was the fact that the defendant refused court orders to deliver evidence, and yet wasn't sanctioned.   I read the transcripts &#38; docs in interest, only to realize this is NOT a case about blogging or first amendment rights.   It was a case about illegal use of property (ie,. a trademark). 

The plaintiff's lawyer made a few tactical blunders, but the case was lost, not won. It is no more a case for free speech or blogging than it was for world peace...

If anyone is interested, all the documents are available online for download, and the truth speaks for itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The interesting thing about that case was the fact that the defendant refused court orders to deliver evidence, and yet wasn&#8217;t sanctioned.   I read the transcripts &amp; docs in interest, only to realize this is NOT a case about blogging or first amendment rights.   It was a case about illegal use of property (ie,. a trademark). </p>
<p>The plaintiff&#8217;s lawyer made a few tactical blunders, but the case was lost, not won. It is no more a case for free speech or blogging than it was for world peace&#8230;</p>
<p>If anyone is interested, all the documents are available online for download, and the truth speaks for itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.web2learning.net/archives/1336#comment-119916</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web2learning.net/archives/1336#comment-119916</guid>
		<description>The interesting thing about that case was the fact that the defendant refused court orders to deliver evidence, and yet wasn't sanctioned.   I read the transcripts &#38; docs in interest, only to realize this is NOT a case about blogging or first amendment rights.   It was a case about illegal use of property (ie,. a trademark). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The plaintiff's lawyer made a few tactical blunders, but the case was lost, not won. It is no more a case for free speech or blogging than it was for world peace...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If anyone is interested, all the documents are available online for download, and the truth speaks for itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The interesting thing about that case was the fact that the defendant refused court orders to deliver evidence, and yet wasn&#8217;t sanctioned.   I read the transcripts &amp; docs in interest, only to realize this is NOT a case about blogging or first amendment rights.   It was a case about illegal use of property (ie,. a trademark). </p>
<p>The plaintiff&#8217;s lawyer made a few tactical blunders, but the case was lost, not won. It is no more a case for free speech or blogging than it was for world peace&#8230;</p>
<p>If anyone is interested, all the documents are available online for download, and the truth speaks for itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://www.web2learning.net/archives/1336#comment-66457</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web2learning.net/archives/1336#comment-66457</guid>
		<description>That would be cool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be cool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.web2learning.net/archives/1336#comment-66456</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web2learning.net/archives/1336#comment-66456</guid>
		<description>I guess we all better start brushing up on our grammar and look more professional on our blogs. Hey, does this mean we can use a press pass to get into stuff?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess we all better start brushing up on our grammar and look more professional on our blogs. Hey, does this mean we can use a press pass to get into stuff?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
