The MLS Debate

I didn’t respond to Rachel Singer Gordon’s post about what makes a librarian - mostly because I’ve made it pretty clear what my opinion is in the past - but I just have to laugh at this comment and Rachel’s response:

Librarianship is a profession akin to medicine or law. You don’t see people without law degrees calling themselves lawyers; you don’t see people without MDs calling themselves doctors; people without the MLS shouldn’t be able to call themselves librarians.

This comparison is ludicrous. Go ahead: compare your year or two of library school to law school + the bar, or medical school + a residency. Do it with a straight face. I’ll wait for you to compose yourself…

Unfortunately I have heard this one before too! My response (while Rachel’s is awesome) goes a different way. Doctors & lawyers are required to continue their education. They (and other professionals) have to attend X number of credit courses a year in order to keep up with their fields - are librarians? Some - but not all. If librarians were all required to continue their education in order to keep up with changes in the field of research then I’d say this was a valid comparison - but it’s not - because librarians get their MLS and then they get to be called librarians for life - that’s what I consider “ludicrous.”

This entry was posted on Monday, March 31st, 2008 at 7:12 am and is filed under Learning, Library. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

 

4 Responses to “The MLS Debate”


  1. The Liminal Librarian » Blog Archive » Who is a librarian? Links Says:

    [...] The MLS Debate - What I Learned Today [...]

  2. Kay Says:

    Nicole, I agree with you completely!
    There really isn’t any comparison to be made!

  3. Nathan Says:

    Do you think this calls for a more standard continuing education requirement for librarians? As information professionals it would certainly make sense for us to keep up with innovations in the field.

  4. Nicole Says:

    Absolutely!!! I’ve been saying it for years. Before I got my MLS I was taking more opportunities for continuing ed than the “librarians” around me - and yet I was not a “librarian” - what’s that about? If I know more about the profession because I’m out there learning everything I can - then I absolutely better be considered a librarian - and if you have your MLS and haven’t taken the time to go out and learn more in the last 5+ years - you shouldn’t be called a “librarian.” That’s just my opinion.

Leave a Reply