Dave Hook has a good post over on his site about the controversy around the name “Library 2.0″.
If we’re going to come up with a name for these ideas, I’d prefer a name along the lines of ‘The Library 2.0 Movement’ or something else that implies continous improvement.
I think that’s a great idea - when I talked to Dave last week about this he said he didn’t like the idea of the name Library 2.0 because it means you’re either there or you’re not - and I can see how that would upset some people. So let’s say it’s a movement - which it is - and get moving 
