<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Screenshots Not Allowed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.web2learning.net/archives/365/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.web2learning.net/archives/365</link>
	<description>Web 2.0 and programming tips from a library technology enthusiast, What I Learned Today... covers blogs, rss, wikis and more as they relate to libraries.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 07:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul R. Pival</title>
		<link>http://www.web2learning.net/archives/365#comment-3214</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul R. Pival</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 16:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web2learning.net/archives/365#comment-3214</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, it &lt;a href="http://cogdogblog.com/2006/06/15/final-maybe-from-flickr/" rel="nofollow"&gt;looks like Flickr isn't likely&lt;/a&gt; to back down on this one. :-(

"This is not because we hate Second Life, or hate screenshots, or hate you, or have any specific official opinion at all about philosophical questions like Ã¢â‚¬Å“What is a photograph?Ã¢â‚¬Â or Ã¢â‚¬Å“Where is the dividing line between real and virtual worlds in our brave new digital age?Ã¢â‚¬Â (personally, IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m sympathetic to the argument that Ã¢â‚¬ËœphotosÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ taken with Ã¢â‚¬ËœcamerasÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ in SL are actually photos).

ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s because Flickr is *for* photos. Even when we have support finer-grained distinctions in our search system, better tools for self-flagging, and allow users to choose what kind of images show up in their search results, by default we will only show photo results."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, it <a href="http://cogdogblog.com/2006/06/15/final-maybe-from-flickr/" rel="nofollow">looks like Flickr isn&#8217;t likely</a> to back down on this one. <img src='http://www.web2learning.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&#8220;This is not because we hate Second Life, or hate screenshots, or hate you, or have any specific official opinion at all about philosophical questions like Ã¢â‚¬Å“What is a photograph?Ã¢â‚¬Â or Ã¢â‚¬Å“Where is the dividing line between real and virtual worlds in our brave new digital age?Ã¢â‚¬Â (personally, IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m sympathetic to the argument that Ã¢â‚¬ËœphotosÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ taken with Ã¢â‚¬ËœcamerasÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ in SL are actually photos).</p>
<p>ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s because Flickr is *for* photos. Even when we have support finer-grained distinctions in our search system, better tools for self-flagging, and allow users to choose what kind of images show up in their search results, by default we will only show photo results.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://www.web2learning.net/archives/365#comment-3213</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web2learning.net/archives/365#comment-3213</guid>
		<description>Unfortuntately I fit into that category - I want to share screenshots of what I'm doing - not my photos - so my stuff won't be public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortuntately I fit into that category - I want to share screenshots of what I&#8217;m doing - not my photos - so my stuff won&#8217;t be public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul R. Pival</title>
		<link>http://www.web2learning.net/archives/365#comment-3212</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul R. Pival</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 14:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web2learning.net/archives/365#comment-3212</guid>
		<description>Well it's not that they're not &lt;b&gt;allowed&lt;/b&gt; - just that if your account contains over 50% of its content as screenshots they won't be displayed to the public.  So if you've got mostly photos and want to throw a few screenshots in the mix there's no problem at all.  Still, it's a dumb policy, and I hope they remove that barrier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it&#8217;s not that they&#8217;re not <b>allowed</b> - just that if your account contains over 50% of its content as screenshots they won&#8217;t be displayed to the public.  So if you&#8217;ve got mostly photos and want to throw a few screenshots in the mix there&#8217;s no problem at all.  Still, it&#8217;s a dumb policy, and I hope they remove that barrier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
