<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cars 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.web2learning.net/archives/391/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.web2learning.net/archives/391</link>
	<description>Web 2.0 and programming tips from a library technology enthusiast, What I Learned Today... covers blogs, rss, wikis and more as they relate to libraries.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Julian</title>
		<link>http://www.web2learning.net/archives/391#comment-4242</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 13:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web2learning.net/archives/391#comment-4242</guid>
		<description>... and that's how you know that "2.0" (as a label) is quickly becoming a passing fad. I thought the same thing when I saw that Nissan commercial. Volkswagen, on the other hand, in its re-release of the Rabbit, chose not to call it "Rabbit 2.0."

Besides, everyone knows that the real target is 3.0. (Remember Microsoft Windows 2.0?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; and that&#8217;s how you know that &#8220;2.0&#8243; (as a label) is quickly becoming a passing fad. I thought the same thing when I saw that Nissan commercial. Volkswagen, on the other hand, in its re-release of the Rabbit, chose not to call it &#8220;Rabbit 2.0.&#8221;</p>
<p>Besides, everyone knows that the real target is 3.0. (Remember Microsoft Windows 2.0?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
