CIL2008: WoePac to WowPac

Karen Schneider moderated this very interesting two part session on WoePac to WowPac – a look at OPACs as we know them and would like them to be. As a librarian who has often torn her hair out over the sad state – “or should I say sucky state” of our OPACs she’s the perfect person to be introducing the speakers for this session.

First off, Roy Tennant. Roy started off by saying “I’ve spent the last 10 years trying to kill off the the word OPAC – you can see how successful I’ve been.”

Roy wanted to clarify for us that when he talked about the “OPAC” he’s just talking about the discovery part of our systems – the public interface – not the entire ILS. He introduced us to a few tools that add a new discovery level to our systems that harvests data out of the ILS.

When you’re ready for a change in your library you have a few questions to consider before looking at today’s tools.

  • do you want to replace your ILS or just your public interface?
  • can you consider open source options? (some can’t)
  • do you have the technical expertise to set it up and maintain it locally?
  • are you willing to regularly harvest data from your catalog to power a separate user interface?

Some examples of options available to today’s libraries are:

Koha (example from Athens County Public Library)

  • faceted browse
  • highlighted search words
  • availability information
  • no harvesting of information required – because it’s an ILS

Evergreen (example from Georgia Pines)

  • faceted browse

    • some issues with them – strange terms coming up in the facets
  • no harvesting of information required – because it’s an ILS

VuFind

  • discovery layer only
  • in development (they haven’t started using it themselves yet)
  • the interface looks really good
  • faceted browse
  • availability info shown (it’s being extracted out of the ILS)

LibraryFind (example from Oregon State University Library)

  • MetaSearch system
  • faceted browse
  • clean interface
  • you’ll see articles interfiled among the books in results
  • you can see databases searched

WorldCat Local (example from University of Washington)

  • local branding
  • local version of worldcat.org
  • articles included from some databases
  • real benefit is that you can search the world – so first it searches the local library and then the consortium and then the rest of the world

Next up Kate Sheehan who was part of the first library to use LibraryThing for Libraries. I like Kate’s definition as a bibliophile/social networking mashup (hope the credit for that doesn’t belong with someone else – if so – I’m sorry).

LibraryThing has a ton of data about books and readers and the readers are not afraid to use it. While LibraryThing is all about users (they want to search and catalog their own way) – LibraryThing for Libraries is all about the masses of data.

Kate showed us the search results for “OPAC sucks” in Google and there were 3 pages of results (I got 10 pages).

To improve a woepac, LibraryThing for Libraries takes all the neat stuff that LibraryThing knows and dumps it into your OPAC – any OPAC because this tool is platform agnostic.

Kate gave us a preview of what this tool does:

  • it shows other editions of the title that the library has
  • shows similar books and it’s really good (once again only based on things in the library)
  • can even add reviews with a Greasemonkey script

Computers in Libraries
Originally uploaded by nengard

So how hard is it to implement? Kate says it’s so easy a monkey could do it – really! It’s just a simple javascript that you copy and paste into your template and you’re done.

LibraryThing bases this stuff on what people have actually read (not what they’ve bought – like Amazon). If there is anything wrong with LibraryThing for Libraries, it’s that it doesn’t work as well with non-isbn books – all of these features are based on comparing ISBNs.

So why do libraries want LibraryThing? Basically, data doesn’t grow on trees and LibraryThing has this wealth of information to share with libraries. This is a pretty simple concept.

This is a great tool – especially for libraries with a lot of ISBN materials.

Next up was, Cindy Trainor with a talk titled: “Are we there yet? Next generation library catalog enhancements: an assessment.” Cindi agree with Marshall Breeding (a summary I haven’t written yet) when he says that these next gene systems aren’t really there yet – there is still a long way to go. For that reason Cindi introduced us to her 4 very best websites using her own totally arbitrary system of rating.

Great websites need to have a combination of these 4 characteristics:

  • content – print, video, audio, etc
  • community – communication – power lies in it’s collectiveness – content created by a community in a community for a community
  • interactivity – a single website that people visit and interact with – searchability included in this
  • interoperability – APIs – things that let us pull data from multiple systems and merge them into one (Z39.50, RSS)

The more of these elements a site has the better it is – in Cindi’s opinion. Of her four best websites, Cindi went into detail about Flickr which scored a 26 on her scale (which had a max of 32 points). Flickr made it onto her top 4 because it met all of the criteria:

  • content (photos)
  • community (giant group of users)
  • interactivity (search, browse, never run into a dead end)
  • interoperability (interface into flickr that lets you go in and do other things with the content – badges, posters, flickr soduko, spell with flickr, flickr mashups)

The other top sites were Amazon scoring 26, Pandora scoring 20 and Wikipedia scoring 21.

So, where are the next gen catalog enhancements on this scale?

When you think about what a legacy OPAC looks like we have come a long way – but we still have a long way to go! Cindi showed us a Voyager OPAC and replaced most of the words with blah blah blah – because this is what our patrons see and Voyager scored a 2 using her fake rating system.

Last up was John Blyberg. John didn’t talk to us about our OPACs per say, but the system redressed.

John started with a quote from Robert Pirsig in “Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance”:

“The overall name of these interrelated structures is system. The motorcycle is a system. A real system …There’s so much talk about the system. And so little understanding. That’s all a motorcycle is, a system of concepts worked out in steel … the motorcycle is primarily a mental phenomenon.”

He feels that we sort of fetishize our OPACs – the WowPac doesn’t exist – the fact that we can’t put it together is not that it’s hard to do – it has more to do with what sits behind the system. Like the motorcycle our systems are a mental phenomenon.

Consider the library work flow as container versus content – the OPAC is container – the content is then the information in the OPAC.

“I really wish we could get rid of the concept of OPAC – because of the system behind them our OPACs seem to get put into these little boxes – what happens to a plant if you put it in a pot that’s too small for it? It withers and dies and this is what’s going on with our OPACs – they’re being impaired by not getting to the content in our systems.” While I may not have gotten the quote exactly right – this is a really good image from John of what our OPACs are doing to our precious data.

John makes another great point that the OPAC really should be spilling out onto our websites and beyond – Facebook and Flickr and such – not just search boxes – but applications that can trigger based on page content. So if you’re on Facebook viewing something about Harry Potter you get a pop up or a column with library data related to the page you’re on.

We need an understanding of how information flows from point a-b – the term systems librarian is going to be obsolete because we’re all going to be systems librarians (in fact at Drexel, systems is a required course – so in their eyes, we already area). Systems does not have to do with technology only – but the system of our library (the processes we follow day to day).

John also reminds us that in today’s information ecology there is no destination = most people are online to experience information.

A great combination of viewpoints all in one place! I’m glad that I stayed in the room all day :)

Technorati Tags: , ,

CIL2008: Avatars to Advocacy

This year at CIL I got to attend my first ever pre-conference. My session was taught by Helene Blowers and Michael Porter and covered the new paradigm of marketing in libraries.

Helene started the afternoon off by talking about the title of the presentation “From Avatars to Advocacy: Innovation Through Un-Marketing.” The term “Un-marketing” is in the title because we were covering a different view than the traditional view of marketing.

Un-Marketing Pre-Conference

Library Brand

When marketing people think about the library brand, they focus on the logo – but it’s a lot more! If you believe the OCLC Perceptions report, the library brand is all about books, but in reality the library brand is all about community! This is a theme I’ve written about a lot recently. So, as we look forward at where we’re going with marketing we want to focus on that part of our brand.

Marketing

The old paradigm of marketing focuses on controlling the look and feel of the brand – our fliers all look consistent – our websites match our print materials, etc. In 1957 it was very easy to reach your market because 45% of the audience were watching Lucille Ball … today we have so many mediums and niche markets to reach. For this reason, mass marketing is going away – and it’s being replaced with niche marketing.

The new paradigm is to influence the character and portability of your brand – allow people to take your brand with them and embed it into their own space allow them to contribute and participate. Helene showed us an example from Gmail that I missed. Google allowed people to make their own Gmail videos and then they merged them into one ad for Gmail.

The question for libraries is how you can enable customers to participate in your branding. Helene recommends reading The Cluetrain Manifesto: The End of Business as Usual and checking out the website. These talk about how markets are about conversations and brands are about getting people to talk about what you’re doing.

What strategic elements do we need to focus on in order to move our libraries into this model of marketing?

  • Engage – to enable customers to connect with library staff its services with each other in meaningful ways (the switch is to allow them to connect with each other)
  • Enrich – to provide our customers with a rich online experience that enhances their local branch experience and daily lives (let them find communities everywhere – in the library and out of it – and of course those who come and visit the web)
  • Empower – to enable our customers to personalize their library experience allow our community to celebrate themselves (Gmail video celebrates the people using Gmail – not just Gmail itself) – we want our customers to feel good about themselves

Helene shared a great quote with us: “Consumers are beginning in a very real sense to own our brands and participate in their creation….We need to learn to begin to let go” – A. G Lafley, CEO and Chairman of P&G, October 2006. Another book to read on this topic is Rengen: The Rise of the Cultural Consumer – and What It Means to Your Business by Patricia Martin in which the author says “cultural consumers thrive on information and ideas to fuel to their creative self-expression.”

Real Libraries

Next Michael took over to show us a bunch of great examples. He pointed out that we’re seeing a lot of these communication tools being used by institutions – so the institutions start the process and they do more than the user – but this is going to shift more to the users.

I agree with Michael when he says that people will give money to things they love – make them love you and they will participate. Look at what Gmail did – it’s cool to be associated with Gmail and so everyone wanted to participate. Another example of this is the model LibraryThing uses to have people pay for their membership. They give you choices as to what you can pay. So if you really like them you can pay more than they’re asking (which I did). If you put your library out there then they will send it to their friends – the spread of the word of mouth is much more now that we have blogs, social networking and email.

Michael sounds like an evil marketer when he says “get them when they’re kids and teens – never lose a hold on our market” but the truth is that we can do that with a clean conscience because we’re just trying to build up our market. Libraries tend to had a culture of “no” and we have to get out of that or we’re going to go down. This includes allowing kids and teens to participate in marketing our libraries.

Examples of neat marketing tricks:

  • Flickr groups like 365 Library Days Project and libraries and librarians – no one is making money off of it – it’s information so you can use tools like this to repurpose information for your community
  • Meebo-rooms – created 365 Library Days Project room – everyone came to the room and asked what it was about
  • Second Life Library 2.0 – example from libraryland that can be repurposed

One library that is doing neat things is the Santa Clara County Library. Another is Palo Alto City Library which has a good blog and a presence on other social networking sites such as Flickr and Facebook. Others includes Kankakee Public Library and San Mateo County Library – both are using these tools and twisting them to their purposes. Brooklyn College Library has shown real results by using MySpace.

Michael says “I could give a hoot about the brand name – I care about the functionality – the community and content – and if those tools help our users access content through us then they are successful – we just have to use these things to be better at our missions. “It’s not about us!” – it’s about our community. How true and awesome to hear someone else saying this!

Engaging Our Community

“Brands are built on what people are saying about you, not what you’re saying about yourself” – Guy Kawasaki

Helene showed us a bunch of other examples:

  • Hennipin County Library site where they had pictures of people reading Harry Potter when the latest book was released. They used the Flickr API to upload images via their site and featured them on the homepage.
  • Columbus Metro library has a teen gallery – allowing teens to feature their art on the homepage- it’s about letting them use our space to celebrate themselves
  • YouTube & we love our NJ libraries – search for “3 reasons library” – why should libraries be telling you three reasons you should love us? why not have them showcase it for us??
  • The Public Library of Charlotte & Mecklenburg County used Big Huge Labs to create inspirational posters – used during National Library Week – no “read” posters of celebrities – encouraged patrons to upload their own images and showcase real patrons
  • Denver Public Library last summer encouraged teens to create videos on how they had fun in the library – took a risk by allowing teens to spread the word – winner did a book angel (like snow angel) on a table
  • Louisville Free Public Library – last summer – after the summer reading challenge they gave them winners a sign to take pictures on their lawn – and put the pictures on their homepage

Helene then gave us 8 steps to take back to our libraries in order to better market them:

  • educate – learn about social media
  • experience – participate and join the conversation (can’t just learn from reading books – have to participate in order to understand)
  • envision – develop a 2.0 marketing plan (tie into your mission/vision)
  • engage – create social celebrations (social situations – things that tie into community events)
  • enable – help your library brand and content travel (allow customers to share and repurpose content – widgets)
  • expand – play with multimedia (libraries are very text heavy – move away from it)
  • explore – learn as your go and track success (as you play you’re going to find things that aren’t relevant – but if you don’t try there is no way you’re going to learn)
  • Experiment, Experiment, Experiment

Conclusion

Last note: always remember – the best way to get customer to market our brand is to allow them to promote us (the library) by marketing themselves.

Slides are online and we took photos of our brainstorming session and tagged them cil2008aa and cil2008unmarketing.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

CIL2008: Widgets, Tools, & Doodads for Library Webmasters

First off Darlene Fichter and Frank Cervone are like a stand up comedy act with really neat tools to make our lives easier! I just love attending their presentations each year. So let’s get to the meat (excuse my lack of capitalization):

Firefox Tools:

  • safecache – protects your privacy – defends against cache-based tracking techniques
  • foxmarks – automatically syncs bookmarks with a web version at my.foxmarks.com – works across work and home computers
  • FEBE – firefox environment backup extension – quickly and easily backup your Firefox extensions – easily sync your office and home browsers – also backup things that aren’t extensions

Other web tools:

  • meebo chat widget – topeka & shawnee county public library – on the no results found page
  • LinkBunch – lets you put multiple links in one small link – firefox extension creates a bunch from all your open tabs
  • DocSyncer – automatically finds and syncs your document files to google docs – this means everything! “users are even reporting that launching a document directly from their desktop using DocDyncer is FASTER than launching the doc native in microsoft office” – Frank says yeah right!! – very good and simple to sign up (windows, mac, linux) – problem here is that it is everything!! Doesn’t ask you – just does it
  • twhirl – desktop client for twitter
  • polldaddy – fast and simple way to put a poll on your website

For web development:

  • VisCheck – a computer simulation of the entire process of human vision – way of showing what things look like to someone who is color blind
  • Feng GUI – automatic alternative to eye-tracking – creates heat maps
  • browsershots – creates screenshots in different browsers – open source online service – submit your web address – added to the job queue – distributed to different computers – a bit slow
  • Flickr photo badge – have an account for your library and add photos
  • photoshop expresstutorial
  • add this – forget location: this web distribution – allow people to bookmark things where they want – also gives you button stats
  • Google gadgets – countdown
  • altavista babelfish site translator
  • Google translate my page

Nifty utilities:

  • processtamer – monitors cpu usage of processes – reduces the properties of apps that hog the cpu – windows only
  • file hamster – real time back and archiving of your files while you work – stores notes about the changes that have been made
  • syncback freeware – backup all files anytime with a single click – also allows machine to machine backup via ftp – versioning – scroll down to the bottom where the freeware link is
  • linkextractor – get all links from a page to repurpose
  • moving large files – mailbigfile.com | zupload.com | yousendit | mediafire (not necessarily private – don’t require registration) – pando – 1GB peer to peer (disadvantage everyone needs pando)
  • recaptcha – stop spam – this does good for internet archive too – shows a word that was OCRed
  • anonymouse – want to do things privately – check if resources are accessible outside your IP range or not
  • prism – an application that lets users split web applications out of their browser and run them directly on their desktop – from mozilla labs – makes the app look like a client instead of a browser

More:

In true Darlene and Frank fashion they ended by telling us that they didn’t want their talk to be all work and no play. They introduced us to a gag site that we can use to scare our colleagues and friends – lolinator.com.

Technorati Tags:

CIL2008 – Super Searcher

An awesome list of tools from Mary Ellen Bates:

  • Altsearchengines.com – blog of alternative and niche search engines – click the top 100 tab – subscribe to rss feed
  • Keotag – search across web 2.0 sites (technorati, delicious twitter and more)
  • MSN product reviews – search for a specific brand
  • Google’s new n improved timelines – creates a readable page easy to scan and identify trends (find when there was a buzz about a particular topics) – yellow line at the top shows where there was a buzz
  • Watch for blended search results – lower precision results, but more long-tail content, esp. for obscure topics – seeing a lot more other search results (products, directions – what for what else appears at the top of the screen) – look at search results with new eyes
  • searchCrystal – touchy feeling
  • Carrot2.org – clustering on demand with a choice of search engines – let’s your determine how the search results are organized – uses different algorithms
  • Loki toolbar – find location-dependent content – based on IP address or nearby wifi signals – tells you where you are not and locates on map – search locally
  • Customizegoogle.com – Firefox fix for Google – nice customization – removes ads – infinite scroll results
  • Google has experimental search – new way to see results – add view:timeline or view:info to your search query and you see things like dates or images or measurements on the pages – more efficient way to find images on a page
  • Searchmash – unbranded Google site – cool interface – why do i care? it’s extremely cool – that’s why! free of ads – lets you see other search indexes on the top right
  • google date-limiting – advanced search screen (remember a date search on the web is never a reliable thing) can also roll your own – add +&as_qdr=dn to the SERP (search results page) URL – where n is the number of days (d15 = 15 days) – items spidered in the last n days
  • Doubletrust.net – a tool for comparing search results – i prefer more results from Google or Yahoo – trust-o-meter
  • I’d prefer this… search.live.com – add prefer:word to query – ranks these search results higher – test search “hybrid car prefer:convertible
  • MSN’s misspelling-suggestion engine – lets you find ways to misspell things since things on the web are not always spelled right
  • Ask’s maps – both driving and walking directions – maps.ask.com – takes local topography (san fran – hills=bad) into account (i always use this tool when at conferences – to find out how to walk somewhere)
  • Exalead.com – use Exalead’s NEAR/n operator — (solar OR sun) NEAR/3 power
  • use search engines’ quick answer features – Ask.com Smart Answers – Google’s OneBox – Yahoo’s Shortcuts – MSN’s Instant Answers (at the top of the search results)
  • Gigablast – limit to multiple sites – has all kinds of advanced search features
  • SnapSearch – visual search results – lets you preview the page and lets you interact with the page on the search results screen – based on the Gigablast search engine
  • Pagebull – metasearch tool – entirely visual – no words – all pictures – good if you remember what the page looked liked and can’t remember name
  • Factbites.com – search results deliver small fact-bites – max 30 results – pull factual sentence from the search results
  • TextRunner “information mining” looks for statements like factbites
  • nationmaster.com – source for national stats – cool tool for presenting graphical info (also a statemaster)
  • TouchGraph – find relationship among URLs – finds related books in amazon (uses subject terms) – graphical results
  • just a reminder here – check out podcast lectures from yale, princeton, uc berkley, stanford, johns hopkins – all providing lectures online for free
  • Kosmix – a vertical search engine on steroids – more than just websites – trusted sources – other concepts/related concepts – videos – yahoo questions and answers
  • LOUIS – library of unified information sources – searchable documents from congressional reports
  • public.resource.org for the full text of us supreme court cases – incomplete now – but keep an eye on this one – bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/US/
  • librarianoffortune.com

I know this is a very note-like post – but this presentation lended itself to this style. See Mary Ellen’s list of links.

Technorati Tags:

CIL2008 – Libraries Solve Problems!

Our first keynote was by Lee Rainie, Director, Pew Internet and American Life Project. As usual, he asked us who’s blogging? He also showed us blog posts about him – from previous years – maybe next year something I’ve said here will be on his presentation :)

Why does he ask this? Because blogging is about community building and communication – this is what makes the internet so different and so wonderful – and this is what the era of user generated content is all about – which is a great intro into what followed.

Stats Review

2008

  • 75% of adults use internet
  • 54% with broadband at home
  • 78% own a cell phone
  • 62% connect to internet wirelessly

2000

  • 0% connect to internet wirelessly
  • 5% with broadband at home
  • 46% of adults use the internet
  • 50% own a cell phone

Wireless connectivity has actually brought back the interest in email – the reports of death of email are premature. Wireless also changes people’s ideas about news – people are much more interested in using the internet to connect to news because it’s quick and up-to-date.

In addition to wireless, pictures are now are as important for communication and community as text is – everyone taking pictures (see Flickr for cil2008). In fact, 33% of online adults have profiles on MySpace and Facebook which is amazing – and means they’re sharing information graphically as well as textually.

Which brings us to the fact that blogging is getting hard to talk about because people aren’t seeing what they’re doing as blogging – like if you post on MySpace and Facebook – they don’t realize that that this is actually a way of blogging

Today’s issues

The question this keynote was addressing was how people get information to help them solve problems, this is not a look at general interest information searches. The audience of this study consisted of approximately 169 million adults that have said that they had to find information related to health issues, government, immigration and education.

In the results, 53% of Americans said that they had been to their local library in the last year. But it’s only once you unpack this information that you get to the really interesting part:

  • 62% from Gen Y
  • 59% from Gen X
  • 57% trailing boomers (43-52)

Younger people are using the library more!!! You know – those kids we keep saying can’t read and that we have to get in the door – they’re already there!! In fact, 60% of online teens use the internet at libraries…

Who turns to libraries for problem solving?

  • Young adults – 18-29 = 21%
  • Older (over 70) = 15%
  • Blacks = 26%
  • Latinos = 22%
  • Lower income < $40,000 = 17%

And the most popular problem-solving searches done at libraries:

  1. decisions related to education or getting training (self or child)
  2. jobs
  3. serious illness
  4. taxes
  5. medicare

Of these people:

  • 69% talked to library staff
  • 68% used computers (38% got one-on-one instruction)

Shows that both technology and computers matter – patrons are using both almost equally!! How awesome is that??

When asked what their future intentions for visiting the library were, 29% said they likely would go to libraries – once again it’s the break down that’s interesting:

  • Less well off – 40%
  • Gen Y – 41%
  • Less educated 41%
  • Latinos – 42%
  • Blacks – 48%

So what are the young people the most likely to come in and come back? Why do they have an affinity for libraries? Lee’s hypothesis is that young people have had the most recent experience with libraries – they’ve done homework there – they’ve been forced to go in – and so they are more aware of how libraries have changed than any other age group – they’ve witnessed the change and they know that we can help – they have had good experiences and they are likely to repeat then.

Lee reminds us that the people who are likely to go to libraries are those who know you and love you best! We just need to educate people on how we’ve changed – put more effort into public education on what you do and how you do it – this could really pay off.

It’s also important to keep in mind that your patrons are happy (and some are zealous) advocates. This being the era of consumer evangelists – some of whom might be influential in your community. Give them the tools necessary (blogs, etc) to share the good news about your library.

Even your “un-patrons” are primed to seek you out. The people who might be more dependent on libraries for help are awake of what you offer and your special skills. Keys for their patronage include awareness of your work, comfort in your environment (embarrassed to look stupid – nervous to ask questions), and mentoring skills (provide tech support and hand holding and get people up to speed).

Conclusions

This is the era of social networks – people rely on these networks more now than they ever have. Libraries should aspire to be a node in people’s social networks – social networks are for learning – social networks are for news and navigation – social networks are for support and problem-solving.

I have to be honest, I was a bit worried that Lee’s talk would be the same one I’ve heard for years here at CIL – but I’m glad I gave it a chance! This was new content and it’s more interesting listening to him talking about it instead of reading the report alone ;)

Technorati Tags:

Computers in Libraries – here I come

I didn’t think I’d get to attend this year, but I will be there with bells on! I am registered, hotel booked and have already volunteered to moderate the Open Source track on Wednesday. You can see my schedule as it develops on the CIL 2008 Wiki. Can’t wait to see all of my “online” friends again!

Technorati Tags:

CIL Presentations

I know that the link has been up for a while – but it looks much more populated now. If you missed CIL and want to see some of the presentations take a look on the InfoToday site. When you find a presentation you like you can do a blog post search to find more info on the presentation (since I know that some slideshows just aren’t enough to get a feel for what was really said).

My conference coverage (which I never finished) is available here.

Technorati Tags:

Follow up on Change in Libraries

At CIL David Lee King gave an amazing talk on Guiding Information Pros Through Change.

I mentioned in my summary that David started out with a few questions for the audience:

First, I asked if attendees had learned something innovative or new at the conference that they'd like to take back to their libraries. Almost everyone raised their hands. Then I followed up with this question: how many will take that cool, innovative idea back to their libraries, and hit a brick wall with administrators when they try to implement that idea.

ALMOST EVERYONE RAISED THEIR HANDS.

The fact is that what Helene said was right – a lot of innovative people were at Computers in Libraries absorbing as many neat ideas as they could – but all with the fear in the back of their heads that they’d have to battle to get any of them implemented. In David’s reflective post How Can We Change the Unchangeable, or David's Rant he asks administrators a few good questions:

I have a question for the library administrators who sent staff to Computers in Libraries, but who also don't plan to do anything with the new knowledge their staff gained from the conference. Why did you send them? Why did you pay good money for the conference, for the hotel, for the food, for the flight"¦ probably $1000 or so – to go to a conference that's geared towards sharing best practices for implementing emerging technology in libraries?

Why send them if you don't plan to do anything with their new knowledge?

Which touches on Julian’s comment to my post last week – maybe this is why so many people at these conferences just seem to be going through the motions.

Looking for some answers? Check out the comments on David’s post and add your own.

My notes? Well, I found that after my presentation on using blogs and wikis for project management, that attendees in my room had a similar but different problem – getting staff to use new technologies. I’ve had more problems in this are than in the admin area – maybe I’ve been lucky. The fact of the matter is that change hurts and scares and exhausts people – all people – even the techies – but it’s going to happen. I like how David summed up his talk at CIL, by telling us that if we resisted change we’d miss out on a lot:

Most importantly, you'll miss out on the possibility of shaping your new destiny and reality – don't get me wrong, it will be shaped, the question is who do you want to do it – you or someone else?

Seems like a simple question …

My personal solution for dealing with change? Well I posted it a few weeks back – I have a song I listen to over and over (The Wood Song by Indigo Girls).

the thin horizon of a plan is almost clear my friends and I have had a hard time bruising our brains hard up against change all the old dogs and the magician now I see we're in the boat in two by twos only the heart that we have for a tool we could use and the very close quarters are hard to get used to love weighs the hull down with its weight but the wood is tired and the wood is old and we'll make it fine if the weather holds but if the weather holds then we'll have missed the point

Thoughts on Twitter – Part 2

A little over a month ago I posted that I saw no purpose to Twitter … I was wrong. I don’t really have a day to day need to post what I’m doing, but while at Computers in Libraries I signed up because everyone around me was communicating and I felt left out.

David Lee King writes:

Twitter rocks. Sure, it might be a fad. Sure, it might end up being a waste of time (I ultimately don't think so). But with a mostly reliable wifi connection in the conference rooms, there was a constant undercurrent of short one-liner discussions that were fun, and in some cases, really added to the conference. For those participating, it allowed you to see what others were thinking while the speaker was still talking. And make dinner plans"¦ and pass a bunch of insider jokes"¦ :-)

And it was true – at Internet Librarian last year I was never sure where people were going for dinner – or after dinner – this way I was able to keep up with everyone. It was also neat to hear tidbits of other presentations from around the conference center.

So – final verdict? I don’t need Twitter on a daily basis, but I’m certainly going to keep using it at conferences to keep up with everyone and everything – except maybe the Code4Lib conference where everyone is on the IRC channel anyway :)

Technorati Tags: , ,